Simple crop (panoramic)

Articles

What is the difference between a review and an article. Well – to be concise – an article allows me to write what I want without needing to be concise. It allows more freedom; I don’t need to judge or assess, only to analyse. This makes them freer and (if I’m being honest) much more self-indulgent. They won’t always have a connection with a recent film or TV series; sometimes they will be outrageously pedantic, snuffling through cultural mud looking for truffles of interest. Sometimes they will be well written – sometimes they’ll contain extended metaphors as tortuous as the one in the last sentence.

Frequently they may reference that touchstone of all art and literature - Doctor Who – so I apologise in advance and promise to try and restrain myself.

And why articles instead of features? Partially pretention – articles smack of academia whereas features suggests glossy magazines and Sunday supplements. I’m aiming to hit halfway – academic without the academic rigour - glossy without the shallowness. So I want to hybridise articles and features into a new form – ‘farticles’. This new title has, unfortunately, been vetoed by those close to me – so articles it is.

Matt Barber

The Apocalypse 'Now'

The Writer and the Reviewer

Doctor Who is not a Television Series

Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Who

What did Russell T Davies do to us?

What did Russell T Davies do for us?

Doctor Who and Academia

How to Watch Old Doctor Who

More Articles

You are viewing the text version of this site.

To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.

Need help? check the requirements page.


Get Flash Player